A Truth Commission

By Joe Campbell
May 21st, 2009

While not rejecting the idea of prosecutions for clear cases in which the law was broken, there seems to be a growing consensus about the necessity of a truth commission. It has become more and more clear that the fault lies within our system as much as it does in particular individuals. Jeffrey Record reviewing Jane Mayer's The Dark Side [pdf] for the Army War College journal, Parameters quotes Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis whose insight points towards both why we need a truth commissin of a type - and why prosecution is not the most effective option (h/t Tom Ricks):

[T]he greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.

This goes to the argument that Bush administration apologists keep making - that these officials were acting in good faith, were panicked, and though they may have broken some rules, they did so to protect American lives. But this is precisely what Brandeis saw was the most serious danger to liberty.

Tom Ricks gives his opinion of what we need - basing his argument on military strategy - rather than the protection of our way of life:

Just because you have an embarrassing problem, you shouldn't try to hide it, because dealing with it may prepare you for an even bigger challenge down the road. So let's get the torture and interrogation situation straightened out before the next big terrorist attack. My preference, as I've stated before, is for a truth and reconciliation commission that offers an amnesty period during which people would be invited to step forward. Anyone not 'fessing up during that time would face the possibility of prosecution. Again, I think this effort should target those who departed from American history and made torture national policy.

Maureen Dowd has also come around - and she too is looking at the perverse effect on our system of checks and balances that not following up on this matter is having:

I used to agree with President Obama, that it was better to keep moving and focus on our myriad problems than wallow in the darkness of the past. But now I want a full accounting. I want to know every awful act committed in the name of self-defense and patriotism. Even if it only makes one ambitious congresswoman pay more attention in some future briefing about some future secret technique that is “uniquely” designed to protect us, it will be worth it.

Comments

Zeed · 2014-01-25

"So much of the media's attitude toawrd the immigration issue is motivated by blatant status assertion. Milbank wants us to know that he's too cool to have thought about illegal immigration. Sure, he constantly reveals himself as a total ignoramus on the subject, but that's the point: he can afford to be. Nobody from Oaxaca is going to compete for his job."I think that "too cool" thing is right on the money. When you argue with white liberals who support mass immigration, there's definitely a sense that they regard any sort of passion about the issue as tacky.As for Milbank, he's a huge embarrassment to the Post. It bewilders me why they continue to publish his idiotic "analysis" pieces. He must have some truly awful pictures of Katherine Graham in his safety deposit box.

Tags: Foreign Policy, Jane Mayer, Jeffrey Record, Louis Brandeis, Maureen Dowd, Parameters, The Dark Side, The New York Times, Tom Ricks, torture, Truth Commission

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 21st, 2009 and is filed under National Security, Politics, The Bush Legacy, The Opinionsphere, The War on Terrorism. Comments are closed; the conversation is kept as it was.